The New Earth Army

>> Sunday, November 15, 2009

The new movie The Men Who Stare at Goats is a comic take-off on the true story of an Army program to incorporate New Age concepts into the military. In the movie, Jeff Bridges plays an Army Colonel who trains an experimental unit of "Jedi warriors" who bring psychic powers and peacemaking concepts into modern war-fighting. George Clooney plays the most talented soldier trained by this unit, who actually does seem to have psychic powers. Of course, most of the ideas propagated by this so-called New Earth Army, which was based on a real program called the First Earth Battallion, were crazy, did not work, and were scoffed at by the regular Army. Just as you are ready to laugh at and dismiss these wacky ideas, however, the movie provides you a glimpse of how traditional military thinking works. The movie's two main characters get caught in a skirmish between two sets of military contractors who operate with military precision and go at each other with rifles blazing. The fact that they are both supposed to be on the same side does not seem to deter them from causing serious havoc. The moral I took from this story was: think twice before you laugh too hard at the crazy ideas dreamed up by these hippie soldiers; the way that the regular Army fights wars may be even crazier.

Sometimes people get a bit uncomfortable about the touchy-feely aspects of mediation also.  Businesspeople and their attorneys do not necessarily see the utility of discussing their emotional needs, and would often prefer to get down to business and negotiate a deal in an adversarial manner.  They may be put off by mediators who sometimes try to incorporate concepts from psychology, neuroscience, philosophy, game theory, religion or what-have-you.  Although diplomacy has been around for all of human history, the modern field of conflict resolution is still in its infancy, and still needs to develop a better understanding of what works and what doesn't work.  More fundamentally, participants in negotiating resolution of a dispute are often reluctant to let go of their traditional war-fighting mentality. When confronted by some of the crazy ideas that mediators might suggest, participants would probably do well to consider the shortcomings of the usual modes of solving conflicts. Resolution of disputes in the traditional adversary system is generally more costly, highly unpredictable, and at least equally crazy.

5 comments:

Dr. David Leffler November 21, 2009 9:41 PM  

The character Brig. General Hopgood (played by Stephen Lang) in the movie "The Men Who Stare At Goats" is based on Maj. Gen, Albert Stubblebine, US Army (retired).

In reality, MG Stubblebine was an intelligent pioneer in the development of human resource technologies. Bert understood the latent potential of the human mind that warriors would eventually be trained to harness. For instance, field-tests by militaries (Ecuador and Mozambique) and peer-reviewed scientific research published in reputable journals have documented the positive effects of a human resource technology called Invincible Defense Technology.

See the article published in News Blaze titled "Don't Stare at Goats, Read Robert Oates - Permanent Peace" http://newsblaze.com/story/20091112144204zzzz.nb/topstory.html or in Senegambia News titled "Taking The Men Who Stare at Goats Seriously" http://www.senegambianews.com/article/Guest_Editorial/Guest_Editorial/Taking_The_Men_Who_Stare_at_Goats_Seriously/18999 More information can be found on the Internet by searching on "Invincible Defense Technology".

Dr. David Leffler
Executive Director
Center for Advanced Military Science (CAMS)
http://www.StrongMilitary.org

Joe Markowitz November 22, 2009 11:44 AM  

Thanks for the comment and links to all this material. I have to say that even though I did not think this movie totally worked as a movie, it opens up a lot of provocative and interesting ideas that are worth further study.

Kenneth Macfarlane November 22, 2009 2:42 PM  

I am interested to know what you think about the role of non-legal mediators especially those who practice Transformative Mediation. You make it clear that the mind sets of most folk are still set in the litigation 'lets just go at it' approach.

It seems to me that knowledge of the legal format is useful/necessary in mediation however, the prime requirements for a mediator are positive listening skills, strong workplace/life experience and a thorough knowledge of one's own inner territory. The abilty to be nuetral and empathic at the same time is crucial in the transformative process.

What suggestions do you have for developing a better understanding of what works and

Joe Markowitz November 22, 2009 5:48 PM  

Good questions, Kenneth. You've given me an idea to do a whole post on the differences between lawyer mediators, judge mediators, and non-lawyer mediators. I think that all can be successful, with different backgrounds more appropriate for different situations, and I agree with you that the prime requirements are not necessarily what they teach in law school or law practice, in fact sometimes approaching problems from the opposite direction of the way they teach in law school or law practice is necessary.

As far as what works and what doesn't work, I think we need to do more research! This field could use more science.

Kenneth Macfarlane November 23, 2009 7:10 AM  

Hello Joe
I look forward to that post. For the non-legal mediator the question of how best to outreach is a big issue. My thinking is a two pronged approach for example:
a. to various advocacy organisations such as adoption groups where mediation could be a excellent way of resolving issues that arise between adoptees & adopters.
b. Financial advisors and mortgage brokers, they usually are first to hear about discord in marriages/relationships before the issues become hard.
I am also wondering whether outreaching to para-legals that handle caseloads would be an approach you think worthwhile.
The difficulty I can see is the risk of Transformative Mediation being labelled as a therapy with all the ramifications that could arise within the therapeutic community.
Really, I am just brainstorming here trying to find a focus as to how best to raise awareness about this method of dispute resolution.
All suggestions/feedback are welcome

Post a Comment

Copyright notice

All of the written content on this blog is as original as I can make it and is owned by me, Joseph C. Markowitz. No one has permission to copy it for any purpose except for the following:
You can quote me by name. You can link to my site. (In fact, please link to my site!) Beyond that, you need to ask my permission. I'm sure nobody would think of trying to pass off my work as their own or make money from my pastime, but if you do, I have ways of finding out, and I will take appropriate action.

A couple of the photographs on this site are also owned by me, by most are stock or news photographs that I have posted or linked to under my understanding of the doctrine of fair use. I try to remember to provide credits and/or links, and I sometimes ask for permission. If anyone spots something on my site that belongs to you, and that you no longer want to see here, let me know and I will immediately take it down.

News

Loading...

  © Blogger template Werd by Ourblogtemplates.com 2009

Back to TOP